NIH Comes up Short in FY ’07 Budget
People living with multiple sclerosis and their families rely on the vital programs and research made available each year through funding from the annual Labor-Health and Human Services-Education appropriations bill. But this year, agencies that run those programs, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), could come up short. Click above to Take Action and help stop this from happening!
In March of last year, a bipartisan group of 73 Senators voted in favor of the Specter-Harkin amendment to the budget resolution. That amendment provided an additional $7 billion above the President’s fiscal year (FY) 2007 budget request for a broad range of programs and services administered by the Departments of Labor, HHS, and Education. A significant number of House members as well — including the entire incoming House leadership and the Democratic leadership of the Appropriations Committee — strongly supported the additional $7 billion for these programs. That was good news for NIH funding.
Continuing Resolution
However, Congress deferred passage of nearly all the FY '07 appropriations bills last year, including the Labor-HHS bill. Prior to their adjournment, Congress passed a continuing resolution (CR) that kept government running and provided temporary funding for those agencies through February 15, 2007 (except Defense and Homeland Security, which Congress passed separately last fall).
More recently, Representative David Obey (WI) and Senator Robert Byrd (WV), the incoming chairs of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, announced they will seek to pass a long-term CR to fund all 2007 appropriations through the end of the current fiscal year (September 30, 2007). However, the CR, by design, provides continuing funding at the existing levels '06 levels, which means no new funding for FY '07. That’s where things fall short and significantly impact federal programs and agencies.
A full-year CR for FY '07 would not provide the additional $7 billion for Labor-HHS and would leave those critical programs $2 billion short. It would undermine the goal of the full Senate when it adopted the Specter-Harkin budget amendment as well as the commitment made by House leadership to significantly increase funding for those priorities.
Additional CR Impact on NIH and Research
In separate legislative action, the House and Senate agreed last year on a bill to reauthorize the NIH through 2009. The authorized increase for the NIH budget was approximately 7% for fiscal year 2007, 8% for fiscal year 2008, and “such sums as may be necessary” for fiscal year 2009. We were extremely pleased with the authorization and what it could mean for NIH programs. However, the year-long CR will prevent the NIH from receiving the funding increases appropriated for FY '07.
Take Action Today
In recognition of the considerable shortfall, Rep. Obey and Sen. Byrd have indicated they would try to increase funding levels for select labor, health, and education programs. This gives us some optimism and flexibility to push for the funding we need for the programs and research that benefit people with MS.
Contact your Senators and Representative today. Ask them to honor the previous Congressional commitments and provide an additional $7 billion to the Labor-HHS budget resolution. Click above to Take Action.
Funding Delayed for New Respite Care Act
Hours before its final adjournment, the 109th Congress passed the Lifespan Respite Care Act. Many calls and e-mails from MS activists helped secure this success for people living with MS and their family caregivers. The Act provides $30 million in the first year and almost $300 million over five years for competitive grants for states to increase the availability of respite care services for family caregivers of individuals with special needs regardless of age. The bill also promotes a coordinated system of accessible respite care at the state and federal level. This success has made many headlines. Read a related letter to the editor in the Raleigh News & Observer and front-page article in the Wall Street Journal.
Unfortunately, the year-long CR impacts the new Respite Care Act as well. Given the current budget scenario and the fact that FY '07 will be administered under a year-long CR, no budget will be available until FY '08 for this program.
The Department of HHS is responsible for implementation of this new law. It will require states to build networks with organizations within the community to deliver respite services and ensure that proper funding is secured (the program will provide 75% funding from federal monies but states will need to come up with the rest). That arrangement should allow for the Society’s Chapters to be active in helping states to secure respite grants. Details of exactly how the program will work should be coming soon from HHS. We will follow developments of this law closely and will update Chapters so they can develop the best strategies to pursue funding with their states.
Stem Cell Legislation Moves Forward
On Friday, Congress re-introduced the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act (H.R. 3 and S. 5). The bills are expected to move quickly through both chambers. In fact, the House has announced its intention to vote on H.R. 3 on January 11. MS activists were immediately alerted to take action on this issue. If you have not already contacted your elected officials to support this bill, please do so today. Click here to Take Action.
As the stem cell legislation pressed forward, a new stem cell study in the scientific journal Nature Biotechnology caused a stir this week on Capitol Hill as supporters and opponents alike tried to interpret what it meant for the bill. The research found that stem cells taken from amniotic fluid, obtained in routine prenatal testing, could be coaxed to make nerve, liver and bone cells — versatility also found in human embryonic stem cells. That is exciting news and the Society is looking closely at the development. But it is important to note that this discovery is very early and has not been subject to peer review.
In the mean time, this new study does not change the Society’s position on stem cell research or our support of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act.
Even top researchers urge caution in interpreting the research:
According to news reports, the head of Wake Forest’s regenerative medicine institute and a senior researcher on the project, Dr. Anthony Atala, wrote to sponsors of the stem cell legislation on Monday after the study was released: “I understand that some may be interpreting my research as a substitute for the need to pursue other forms of regenerative medicine therapies, such as those involving embryonic stem cells,” Atala wrote. “I disagree with that assertion.” Advances in embryonic stem cell research, he reportedly said, could help advance studies into amniotic stem cells and other forms of the cells. Click here to read the Associated Press story.
Harvard University researcher Dr. George Daley said in a January 8, 2007, MSNBC.com article: “While they are fascinating subjects of study in their own right, they are not a substitute for human embryonic stem cells, which allow scientists to address a host of other interesting questions in early human development.”
The Society supports the conduct of scientifically meritorious medical research, including research using human cells, in accordance with federal, state and local laws and with adherence to the strictest ethical and procedural guidelines. Research on all types of stem cells is critical because we have no way of knowing at this point which type of stem cell will be of the most value in multiple sclerosis. Stem cells – adult or embryonic – could have the potential to be used to protect and rebuild tissues that are damaged by MS, and to deliver molecules that foster repair or protect vulnerable tissues from further injury. Many advances in research and treatment are moving us closer to a world free of MS.
MS Research Petition Drive Update
We are in the final stretch of the MS research petition drive and need your help during this last month to add as many signatures as we can by February. All signatures will be used to help support a significant increase in federal funding for MS research when we take the petition to Capitol Hill in March. To sign your name, post a petition in your community, or follow the progress of your local chapter, visit http://msactivist.blogspot.com/.
